首页> 外文OA文献 >Qualitative study of educational interaction between general practitioners and specialists.
【2h】

Qualitative study of educational interaction between general practitioners and specialists.

机译:对全科医生和专科医生之间的教育互动进行定性研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To identify the main barriers to effective educational interaction between general practitioners and specialists and to suggest ways of overcoming these barriers. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and focus groups. A content analysis of the data was performed. SETTING: South and West Regional Health Authority. SUBJECTS: 12 general practitioner principals and 12 hospital consultants were sampled purposefully and underwent a semistructured interview; a further 16 general practitioners and 16 hospital consultants similarly sampled made up four focus groups representing the two branches of the medical profession. RESULTS: There was a mismatch between what the general practitioners wanted from specialists in educational terms, and what the specialists were providing. General practitioners wanted to learn information that was directly applicable to their clinical work and to use referrals as two way learning opportunities. They were not sufficiently explicit about their learning needs. Specialists preferred to concentrate on new developments in their subject and would benefit from learning different ways of teaching. The participants were willing to learn from each other. Three models of educational interaction were identified: traditional didactic lectures given by specialists to general practitioners, interactive clinically based teaching, and informal interaction based on referrals. CONCLUSIONS: The two main branches of the medical profession have to address several significant problems before the full potential of teaching and learning together can be realised.
机译:目标:确定全科医生和专科医生之间进行有效教育互动的主要障碍,并提出克服这些障碍的方法。设计:使用半结构化访谈和焦点小组进行定性研究。进行了数据的内容分析。地点:南部和西部地区卫生局。研究对象:12位全科医生和12位医院顾问被有针对性地抽样,并接受了半结构化访谈。另有16名全科医生和16名医院顾问以类似的方式抽样,组成了代表医疗行业两个分支的四个焦点小组。结果:全科医生在教育方面想要从专家那里得到的东西与专家提供的东西之间是不匹配的。全科医生想学习直接适用于其临床工作的信息,并希望将转诊作为两种学习机会。他们对学习需求不够明确。专家更喜欢专注于其学科的新发展,并且将从学习不同的教学方法中受益。参加者愿意互相学习。确定了三种教育互动模式:专家为全科医生提供的传统教学讲座,基于临床的互动教学以及基于推荐的非正式互动。结论:医学界的两个主要分支必须解决几个重大问题,才能充分发挥教与学的全部潜能。

著录项

  • 作者

    Marshall, M. N.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1998
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号